Exclusive Sights and Sounds of Georgia Football

We Went Undercover...

Check Out Some of the Sights of Georgia Football
Click Each Photo For A Larger View


Student Section Pre-gameUGA Statue Players Hit When Running Out
Israel TroupeGeorgia G




Rennie CurranUGA VII's House
Fire Twirler/RedcoatsUGA Offense Huddles During Game



Hairy DawgUGA VII's House














a BRB© production

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS

Google Wave: What is that?

Google is at it again. They've come out with another world-changing technology called Google Wave that is catching on quick. So here's what you need to know.


Google Wave is a fast, easy way to communicate with people in real-time. Real-time is a word that gets thrown around these days, but what does it actually mean? It means that if you are writing a message to some one or a group of people using Google Wave, they can see what you are writing as you are writing it! Pretty cool, huh? Just be careful what you write.

Google Wave works kind of like an email. You select who you want to 'wave' with and then you start typing. As you are making a wave, there are many new things you can do such as add a poll, add a map to where you're talking about, and even embed a game that your wave party can play. This brings to light a whole new way of communicating with people. Say you are planning a party, for example. There's so many decisions to be made, like would your guests rather have black or white napkins? Well now, you can simply put up a poll and let the people decide. How democratic of you. Also, for all those people who ask "where's your house again?," now you can give them a map to where they need to go. Bam, no more annoying directionally-challenged guests.

Google has also opened up Wave apps to third parties. This means any developer can make an application for Google Wave! Now, you too can join the app revolution. If any developer is free to make apps, there's no telling how far this technology is going to advance. For example, soon you will be able to conference call through Google Wave using an app called Ribbit.

The only thing that is holding Google Wave back is people can only use it on an invitation basis at the moment. For Google Wave to reach it's full potential, all of your friends, family, co-workers, etc. need to have it and be logged-in often. To communicate in real-time the people you are trying to communicate with have to be using Google Wave when you are communicating with them. Right now, there are not many people who know about Google Wave - much less have an account they use regularly. Once it starts to catch on, this technology has the potential to completely change the way we communicate with each other.

For more information on Google Wave, check out their website by clicking on this link. If you would like an invitation, you can request one here or ask one of your friends who has Google Wave to send you one (each Google Wave user is given 10 invitations).

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS

How Much Does It Cost to Go to the Moon?

Brian, Ruston, and I were asking ourselves "how much would it cost to go to the moon?" Well, I decided to do some research and here's what I found.

Space Tourism has long since been an idea dreamed up by science fiction authors, but in 2001 fiction became reality when multimillionaire Dennis Tito became the first Space Tourist by traveling to the International Space Station (ISS) for a week. Tito was flown to the ISS by an American Agency called
Space Adventures on a Russian space craft called the Soyuz. Since Tito, there have been six other people who have paid to travel to the ISS and back. All seven space tourists have flown on the Soyuz and paid $20-35 million. As of 2009, the Russian Space Agency is the only program offering paid flights to space.

In August 2005, Chris Isidore of CNN wrote an
article stating that Space Adventures would be offering flights to orbit (not land on) the moon for $100 million. At the time, Space Adventures had identified nearly 1,000 billionaires who were willing to pay the price, but, as of today, no such flights have be executed.


In November 2009, Gene J. Koprowski wrote an article for FOX News stating there are various private sector firms, including a well known company: Virgin Galactic (of Virgin Group Ltd.), who are setting up technologies to offer space tourism at more affordable rates. These flights will take the passengers into orbit to the point of weightlessness for a limited time before returning to earth. At the beginning, the flights are rumored to cost $200,000 with the expectation of price reductions as the flights become more popular and more evolved.

As of today, no one has traveled to the moon as a tourist and there are no future plans - that we know of - to offer such services. For now, a trip to the moon remains science fiction.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS

Window 7: WIN or FAIL?

Windows 7 is the latest operating system to hit the shelves since Microsoft's Windows Vista, which was widely reviewed as a failure. So how does Windows 7 stack up?


Windows 7 was released about a month ago on October 22, 2009 and within the first three weeks it gained a 4% market share (it took Windows Vista seven months to attain the same goal). Pre-orders on Amazon.com were record highs, surpassing the previous pre-order record holder, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows. So, demand alone for Windows 7 was much more impressive than the previous Windows Vista.

Windows 7 is available in 3 versions: Home Premium ($119.99), Professional ($199.99), and Ultimate ($219.99). You can see a comparison of features here. Of course, the Ultimate version comes fully equipped, but most people only need the features available in Home Premium. If you're a student, there's is a major discount available to upgrade to Windows 7 Home Premium for only $30. The offer expires January 3, 2010, and you can find it here.

The purpose of the upgrade was to excel where Vista failed. Visually, there is not much of a difference, as both use Windows Aero for graphics. For example, the start menu, for the most part, is the same. One feature I really like is the multi-tasking. You can attach icons to the task bar at the bottom of your screen and when an application is in use the icon will be highlighted with a box around it. If multiple windows of the application are open (i.e. multiple browser windows) you can scroll over the icon and a preview of all the windows will be shown. From this preview you can easily view and selected which one you want to use. This feature is very useful when you have many applications up and running and need to find the one you want. There's also a handy search feature in the start menu that will search your whole computer for any file or application. If you can't find what you're looking for, this feature is very handy. And, finally, supposedly,Windows Media player has some additional, cutting-edge features that would appeal manyto PC users...The ability to stream songs played on Windows Media Player onto other devices that are Bluetooth compatible. There are many new features including Themes, Gadgets, and other various customizations. For a full list of features go here.

As for performance, I have found my computer running a little slower. Provided that I do have a three year old computer, but I have had many instances of waiting too long for applications to open and for the computer to log-in as compared to when I was running Windows XP. I would say the times I have had to wait, I was running multiple applications. If you have a computer with more than 1GB of RAM, I expect the wait time would significantly decrease.

I downloaded the 32-bit version, because I was unsure my 1GB of RAM and 80GB of memory could run the 64-bit version. The 32-bit could contribute to the slow reaction times. For those wondering, the RAM (Random Access Memory) is the part of your computer that handles all the information you're processing at the moment. 32 and 64-bit refers to the way your computer and operating system can process different amounts of information. The 64-bit is able to use more RAM effectively - meaning your computer can handle more information and more applications at one time. If you computer can handle the improvement (4GB of RAM is recommended), I would definitely recommend upgrading to the 64-bit.

Overall, I think Windows 7 is an improvement over Vista. It runs very efficiently and is fairly intuitive and easy to use. I upgraded from XP and was not familiar with Vista, but I found everything easy to find and easy to figure out. I would definitely recommend upgrading to Windows 7 if you're still using XP, or, if you're tired of the failures of Vista. I would especially consider upgrading if you're a student. You can't beat the latest operating system for $30.

Windows 7: WIN.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS

R.I.P. UGA VII




Today, unfortunately, the symbol of the Bulldog Nation, UGA VII, passed away.

He will probably be most remembered for his tenure during the successful careers of Matthew Stafford and Knowshon Moreno. Even though he did not last long, he'll always maintain a place in Georgia Football History.

(Blawg Moment of Silence).

Go Dawgs!

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS

5 Comedies Worth Watching this Season

Now that's it's a couple weeks into the season, here's a list of 5 shows worth your time. And they're all on Hulu (except for How I Met Your Mother)

Modern Family (ABC Wednesdays 9/8c)













What's it about?
Modern Family is about a dysfunctional family with many conflicts and how they overcome their differences.

Who's in it?
Ed O'Neill, Sofia Vergara, Julie Bowen, Ty Burrell, Jesse Tyler Ferguson, and Eric Stonestreet

How's it Different?
After reading the description the show sounds much like Arrested Development (my favorite all-time show - RIP). But this show is different in that there are three different sub families who make up the one big family. The show focuses on the conflicts within the subgroups as well as the the past and present conflicts of the overarching family.

Why do I like it?
I love this show because it is able to mix situatioanl and conversatioanl humor effectively. Most shows tend to focus on one or the other. It's written and directed by the guys who did
Fraiser. I've never watched that show, so I can't say whether it's similar or not. I love all the characters in this show. They are all over the top stereotypical family members (i.e. the 'cool' dad goes above and beyond to try to be friends with his kids).

Community (NBC Thursday 8/7c)












What's it about?
Community focuses on the main character - Jeff Winger (Joel McHale) -who is an ex-lawyer stuck in community college because his law degree has been banned by the State Bar Association. The supporting characters are his friends and members of his study group for Spanish class.

Who's in it?
Joel McHale, Gillian Jacobs, Danny Pudi, Alison Brie, Donald Glover, Ken Jeong, and Chevy Chase.

How's it different?
This show is filled with situational comedy and the occasional dialog humor. The show has a slight Seinfeld feel meaning all the sub-plots intertwine and come together. The school setting keeps things interesting provides for new jokes. Also, Chevy Chase plays a very different character than I'm used to seeing him play. Ken Jeong (as seen in The Hangover, Knocked Up, and Role Models) plays a crazy Spanish teacher. He is absolutely hilarious in all of his roles.

Why do I like it?
The reason I like this show is because it brings new, creative humor to television and manages to stay clean for the most part. For this show to truly be humorous, it is important for the viewer to be familiar with the characters. Character development makes this show increasingly more funny as you learn the background of each person and see them interact with each other.

30 Rock (NBC Thursday 9:30/8:30c)












What's it about?
30 Rock was created by Tina Fey, and is about the writers, actors, and producers of a sketch comedy series on NBC. Hence the name 30 Rock after 30 Rockafella Plaza in New York (the address of the NBC studios). Supposedly 30 Rock is loosely based on Tina Fey's experiences at SNL.

Who's in it?
Tina Fey, Tracy Morgan, Jack McBrayer, Scott Adsit, Jane Krakowski, and Alec Baldwin. With a cast like this you can't go wrong.

How's it different?
30 Rock is so fast-paced with its jokes. The writing is pure genius, and the dialog often moves from joke to joke with little time to pause and laugh. That's what makes it so good. Also, there are always many different situations the characters are thrown in that keep the show moving. This is the most new and refreshing show on television at the moment (even though it's in the 4th season).

Why do I like it?
I love this show because the jokes are so smart and there are so many of them. You really have to pay attention to get the jokes. There's no laugh track or pause before the punchline telling you when to laugh. I also love Alec Baldwin's character - Jack Donaghy. Baldwin is the perfect crazy, out-going boss. He always has something up his sleeve to add to the funny.


How I Met Your Mother (CBS Monday 8/7c)












What's it about?
How I Met Your Mother is about five 30-somethings who are making their way through life post-college. The focus of the show is on Teb Mosby (Josh Radnor) who is re-telling a story to his kids of how how he met their mother.

Who's in it?
Josh Radnor, Jason Segel, Cobie Smulders, Neil Patrick Harris, Alyson Hannigan, and Bob Saget.

How's it different?
How I Met Your Mother goes back to the traditional sitcom format (laugh-track included). Many people thought the show would fail because it was going back to the roots of comedy shows, but the show has really taken off and is well into its fifth season now. It was created by Carter Bay and Craig Thomas who used to write for the Letterman Show. So it has that creative aspect to the comedy. The show also stars many actors whose careers have really taken off yet they have stayed with the show. You can really tell they love making the show and you can often catch them laughing when they aren't speaking.

Why do I like it?
I love How I Met Your Mother because it's so creatively funny. They really do a great job of making the main character easy to relate to. The other characters are so 'out-there' (especially Barney) that you can't help but relate to Ted and how he reacts to them.

It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia (FX Thursday 10pm)












What's it about?
It's Always Sunny.. is about a group of self-centered, egotistical friends and a father who own their own bar in Philadelphia. They always have crazy ideas and try to carry through with all of them.

Who's in it?
Charlie Day, Kaitlin Olson, Glenn Howerton, Rob McElhenney, and Danny DeVito

How's it different?
This show is different in the fact that it's so obscure and off-color at times. Disclaimer: if you're offended by crude and taboo humor this probably isn't the show for you. It has a Seinfeld feel as well in that they're always going on adventures, but end up in the same place at the end. This show is also different because it was created, directed, and acted by the actors themselves. Rob McElhenney is credited for creating the show and Charlie, Glenn and Rob all write for the show. The pilot episode was originally shot on a digital camcorder on a $85 budget. The plot and dialog was so creative and new that FX ordered the first season after watching the pilot.

Why do I like it?
I like It's Always Sunny.. because the comedy is so new and different. They poke fun at some very taboo subjects which keeps things very interesting. I also love the fact that the actors write and direct the show. I can respect that.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS

A Waste of Time

At the beginning of the school semester, I managed to put myself in an art appreciation class. I have been in this class "appreciating art" now for just about 16 months. Some lectures have been rather educational, but most have been a waste of time, yet still entertaining. There is a difference, in my mind anyway, between educational and entertaining. I would rather not be bogged down in a class room when the focus of our learnings is just around the corner. That being said, I have the privelage of being here in Athens, Georgia, a great source for all forms of art whether it be paintings, photography, film, music, or performance art to name a few.

A few weeks back a fellow blogger, Brian Scott, and I decided we would endeavor upon the local arts and host our very own exhibition. With October being Breast Cancer Awareness Month, we imagined it would be a good gesture to raise money. The day was graciously welcomed with generous people, wacky music, unprofessional paintings, and a variety of cheese.. thats right.. cheese.

So here's the deal... description alone, this art exhitibiton could have been viewed as a joke or nothing more than a waste of time (much like my art class), but you if you ask the folks that attented the event, you will find that it was in fact highly entertaining. It was something different that a group has never experienced... and that is art.

Thats me

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS

Bobo Fails Again vs. Auburn





















Thanks to the exquisite photoshop skills of my fellow scribe, Bo Mann, we have this picture, which speaks more truth than Confucius.


As many of you may recall, with 13:14 left in the 2nd quarter of the Auburn game, Joe Cox ran a play action pass, pump-fake, 50 yard TD pass to Israel Troupe. At the time, it seemed like a brilliant play call on the part of Big Bird, Mike Bobo. Not so fast my friend...

On the previous 2 plays before the TD pass to Troupe, Joe Cox quickly threw the ball to stud receiver A.J. Green for 12 yard gains on each play. Following consecutive 12 yard gains, A.J. Green was taken out of the game. I was a little frustrated at Green being pulled, but figured he was taking a breather (I later found out Green was injured). After Green was pulled, Georgia had Troupe in at Flanker, Tavarres King at Split End, Shaun Chapas at Fullback, and Caleb King at Tailback.

Given the personnel in the game, notably without Green, I thought there was no way UGA was going to pass the ball. Thus, I expected another predictable toss sweep to the outside that never works with Caleb King. To my surprise, as stated above, Cox ran a play action, pump fake pass to Israel Troupe (who came off the bench and has not played much at all during the entire season) for a 50 yard TD.

Following the TD pass, I had to bite my tongue and admit that was a good play call, considering no one would have expected UGA to pass without Green in the game, following 2 consecutive pass plays.

Interestingly, today, I find out that Mike Bobo made the play call thinking that A.J. Green was, in fact, in the game on that play. That is, the pass that went to Troupe was designed to go to Green, who wasn't even in on that play. Are you kidding me?

So, what are the issues here, considering UGA did score?

1. Our offensive coordinator, who stands on the field, did not even know that the biggest playmaker on UGA's offense (A.J. Green) was not on the field when making a play call.

2. It implies that if Bobo knew Troupe was in the game instead of Green, that play would have never been called because Big Bird is so conservative and does not trust other receivers...

FAIL.

I say, good for Israel Troupe! That a way to step in and make a big play, showing the coaches the depth of talent on our team.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS

Mark Richt's Seat Heat Rising as Georgia Coordinators Continue Obsolete Methods

Written on November 02, 2009
by Brian Scott

I've been making the same statement for a while now: Mark Richt is a quality individual and head coach who, at one time, was a great offensive mind, especially when he was the offensive coordinator at Florida State.

He still may be a great offensive mind, but Richt has allowed Big Bird (Mike Bobo) to call plays for the last two and a half years.

So, unless Richt has more play-calling authority than the public knows about, I do not know if Richt is still a great offensive mind or not because he is not calling the plays.

Being a successful head coach requires an individual to be elite in knowledge of the game and management of staff/players. I still think Richt's knowledge of the game is elite, but I severely question his management.

Prior to the 2008 season, after Georgia finished No. 2 in the AP Poll, it appeared that Mark Richt was certainly amongst the elite coaches in both knowledge of management.

Georgia went 10-3 during the 2008-2009 season. Thus, a 10-win season is a success, right? No, not necessarily in all circumstances.

Winning 10 games is certainly an impressive feat for most college football teams, but if someone broke down how Georgia lost three games last year, given their talent level, 10 wins seems far less impressive.

1. Georgia was massacred by Alabama 41-30, in UGA Funeral I (Georgia used black jerseys for the second time as a source of motivation to beat Alabama but failed miserably after Alabama put up 31 in the first half.)*

2. Georgia was destroyed by Florida 49-10, a year after the end zone celebration and defeat of Florida 42-30. Georgia was still an outside title contender before this loss.*

3. Georgia embarrassingly blew a 28-12 halftime lead over in-state rival Georgia Tech at home.*

* Georgia had two first round picks in their backfield in Matthew Stafford and Knowshon Moreno. In addition, they had two receivers with 900-plus yards receiving, one of which was a second round draft pick and starter in the NFL (Mohamed Massaquoi) and the other who led the SEC in receiving yards (Green).

Does Georgia's 10-win season still seem as successful? I don't think so.

So, if UGA had all that talent and could only manage 10 wins (let's not forget about UGA surviving Kentucky and Auburn), does this imply that something is flawed with the coaching? Seems plausible.

Entering the 2009-2010 season, somehow, I convinced myself that Stafford and Moreno's egos hindered UGA's chemistry during the 2008-2009 season and believed that Richt would manage and lead a more cohesive "no-name" team to a surprisingly successful season.

I was wrong.

With the losses of Stafford at QB and Moreno at RB, the coaching flaws are becoming even more evident, as Georgia can't simply win on talent. The play-calling, even though good at times, few and far between, rivals that of an amateur playing EA's NCAA Football .

For example, how many freakin' times are people going to see Georgia's offense run HB draws on second or third and long? First off, UGA does not even seem to have the talent at RB this year to be consistently successful at running HB draws. Secondly, whereas other teams are aggressive in these situations, Georgia predictably concedes.

Let's take a minute to analyze Georgia's outdated, "MS-DOS" offense against Florida, or any other team, for the past eternity:

Scenario One

It's 2nd-and-16. Joe Cox lines up in shotgun formation with his feet even and shoulder width apart. This detail about his feet is crucial because when Cox puts one foot forward, he is going to throw, but when his feet are even and shoulder with apart, he almost always runs a HB draw.

Of course, if Bobo implemented different, unpredictable foot patterns, that would be "far too complex" for UGA's offense.

Bobo sends in Caleb King or Richard Samuel, who take forever to run the ball to the outside, to play HB and stand right beside Cox. The ball is snapped, and Cox runs a HB draw to one of these two, and they attempt to run to the outside, at most getting five yards if UGA is lucky.

It's now third down with 10 to 12 yards to go. Cox takes a five-step drop and is blitzed by good defenses, such as Florida or Alabama. Florida plays single coverage on A.J. Green on the outside, and Michael Moore is consistently open in the slot across the middle.

Big Bird (Bobo) calls for an Orson Charles (Tight End) deep out , and Cox throws into double or triple coverage.

...Do you want to continue y/n? y

Scenario Two

It's 3rd-and-9 on the Florida/opposing team's 20-yard line. Big Bird (Bobo) is gonna fool them this time! Georgia runs a HB draw, failing to get a first down.

Score: (in the fourth quarter) Florida/Other team (35), Georgia (17) —yippee!

...Do you want to continue y/n? n

Scenario Three

You have a senior QB who has paid his dues and waited behind Stafford for years now. So, he must be the best to start, right? No. He's only thrown 12 INT in eight games.

But Georgia has this highly talented freshman named Aaron Murray who is supposed to be the future of Georgia football. Can't he start or be given a chance?

Richt to media: We are going to start the QB who gives us the best chance of winning.

Murray hasn't even played, so how do we know that he doesn't give UGA the best chance of winning?

On the flip side, isn't it possible that some QBs give UGA the best chance of losing?

Get the picture now? In addition to the offensive coordination being basic and foolish, the defense has been allowing teams to score points relentlessly.

What's the Main Point?

Suppose you are the CEO of a large company (Mark Richt) and your company's stocks are falling because your top executives (Bobo and Willie Martinez) are possibly not competent or capable of doing their jobs. Would you continue to defend them or keep them at their current level of duties? No, I wouldn't think so.

So, if the company continues to fail and the CEO does not make changes, where would the Board place the blame? On the CEO.

Thus, if UGA's coordination on either side continues to fail and boosters begin to decline in their support of UGA Athletics (falling stocks), and if Richt does not make coordination changes, don't be the least bit surprised when Damon Evans and others place the blame on Richt, not Bobo or Martinez.

And that's where the blame should go.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS